Metavid

Video archive of the US Congress

House Proceeding 07-22-08 on Jul 22nd, 2008 :: 2:47:21 to 2:49:08
Total video length: 4 hours 31 minutes Stream Tools: Stream Overview | Edit Time

Note: MetaVid video transcripts may contain inaccuracies, help us build a more perfect archive

Download OptionsEmbed Video

Views:76 Duration: 0:01:47 Discussion

Previous speech: Next speech:

Brian Higgins

2:44:10 to 2:47:21( Edit History Discussion )
Speech By: Brian Higgins

Brian Higgins

2:47:07 to 2:47:21( Edit History Discussion )

Brian Higgins: a series of regulatory actions in which banks were fined millions of dollars in connection with the accounts they offered m.s.b.'s, most banks felt they had to make a choice, either do their own

Tom Davis

2:47:21 to 2:47:33( Edit History Discussion )

Tom Davis: onsite investigation of an m.s.b.'s anti-money laundering program or live with the liability of not knowing how go or bad that particular program is. madam speaker, banks are not regulators

Tom Davis

2:47:21 to 2:49:08( Edit History Discussion )
Speech By: Tom Davis

Tom Davis

2:47:33 to 2:47:48( Edit History Discussion )

Tom Davis: and we should not expect them to act like regulators for a different industry. no one disagrees that banks and the m.s.b.'s should comply with all applicable anti-money laundering guidance. nonetheless,

Tom Davis

2:47:48 to 2:48:02( Edit History Discussion )

Tom Davis: terminating account services to an entire industry could end up forcing its customers into the underground financial system. that, in itself, creates a significant money laundering risk.

Tom Davis

2:48:02 to 2:48:13( Edit History Discussion )

Tom Davis: the measure before us drafted with a great deal of bipartisan cooperation by the gentlelady from new york, ms. maloney, one of the stars of this institution, and the gentleman from alabama,

Tom Davis

2:48:13 to 2:48:26( Edit History Discussion )

Tom Davis: mr. bachus, would set up a system in which the treasury secretary posts a set of guidelines m.s.b.'s would need to meet to satisfy any money laundering requirement. when they comply, m.s.b.'s would

Tom Davis

2:48:26 to 2:48:41( Edit History Discussion )

Tom Davis: self-certify their compliance to their bank. this self-certification function is balanced by strict penalties for those m.s.b.'s that misrepresent their compliance and would not excuse any banks

Tom Davis

2:48:41 to 2:48:54( Edit History Discussion )

Tom Davis: from reporting suspicious activity, but it would relieve banks of the requirement to be the defacto regulator of m.s.b.'s, which is not the bank's job or obligation. in revealing this

Tom Davis

2:48:54 to 2:49:08( Edit History Discussion )

Tom Davis: bill, the department of justice has raised a good point that i would like to emphasize. the bill requires the m.s.b.'s to certify to the satisfaction of the treasury secretary that they

Barbara Lee

2:49:08 to 2:49:23( Edit History Discussion )

Barbara Lee: are in good compliance, but only requires them to file their certification with their banks. mr. speaker, i think that among the regulations the treasury secretary, the secretary should require the m.s.b.'s

Barbara Lee

2:49:08 to 2:56:35( Edit History Discussion )
Speech By: Barbara Lee

Personal tools

MetaVid is a non-profit project of UC Santa Cruz and the Sunlight Foundation. Learn more About MetaVid

The C-SPAN logo and other servicemarks that may be found in video content are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Metavid